I followed up on Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 already. For additional comparison, here are the corresponding details for Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0.
The Microsoft Office Save As ... format cases are Microsoft Word 97/2000/XP (*.doc) Microsoft Word 95 (*.doc) Microsoft Word 6.0 (*.doc) Rich Text Format (*.rtf) Microsoft Word 2003 XML (*.xml) The only other formats are .odt, .ott, .sxw, .stw, .txt (two flavors), and .html Some folks notice the loss of WordPerfect conversions. I haven't seen much on the inability to export OOXML formats. I suppose an elephant in the room, at least for Windows platforms, is the possibility that the next version of Office (currently known as Office 15) might provide better interoperability with ODF formats than the *Office clan provide for OOXML. I have no reason to believe that will be the case, despite the opportunity that appears to exist for tipping the equation around business use even farther. Also interesting is the fact that Windows Live SkyDrive now supports native (and free) web-based upload, editing, and download of ODF documents at something around the current ODF 1.1 support from Microsoft. It will be interesting to see how that evolves along with the arrival of Office 15 too. This is a way to extend support for Office documents to non-Windows platforms using browsers and the cloud. [On my WindowsPhone 7.5, the Microsoft Office applications are still only for Microsoft Office documents, although OneNote is being provided as an App on other mobile platforms. If I attempt to edit an ODF document that I've uploaded to Skydrive, my phone switches to the browser access for editing the document. That could change too.] - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Russell Wilson [mailto:russwilso...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 20:30 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users? it's been some months since I tried it; I think there are supposed to be some "added extras", but they're all "much the same", depends on what features one wants / needs, and most importantly, "what works" for you, which as someone said, one can only determine subjectively, after trying it out for oneself >________________________________ > From: Ken Springer <snowsh...@q.com> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2012 2:12 PM >Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users? > >On 6/4/12 4:00 PM, Russell Wilson wrote: >> why? further complicate the issue, Aoo works > >I was curious as to whether Lotus Symphony was identical to Aoo, or if there >were things that were better or worse in that release. > > >-- Ken > >Mac OS X 10.6.8 >Firefox 12.0 >Thunderbird 12.0.1 >LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 > > >-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
