Hi :)
+1 

Regards from
Tom :)  






>________________________________
> From: John Clegg <[email protected]>
>To: Pertti Rönnberg <[email protected]> 
>Cc: [email protected] 
>Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012, 12:11
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS raised prices so people will now start 
>renting their office products instead
> 
>I think this is a very fair point. Versions of Ubuntu have an LTS version
>without stopping the development chain progress. It would be really useful
>to have a really mature and settled LTS version of LO that businesses could
>use with confidence.
>
>On 20 September 2012 12:06, Pertti Rönnberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear mr Webmaster,
>> I agree with you about the risks with Microsoft's possible actions in the
>> future -- let us hope we are wrong.
>>
>> I am afraid you got me wrong -- my fault.
>> What I meant by the "break" in developing LibO, was that the LibO's
>> developers for a while should stop proceeding.
>> They must take one specific version of LibO (especially for Windows as the
>> main OS) and make it absolutely free of bugs and failures -- and plus that
>> make the documentations complete and understandable (and thus usable) for
>> ordinary non-expert computer users.
>> And then - after that - continue again.
>>
>> Why? Because I have been a Windows user since early -80 and installed
>> OpenO decades ago.
>> Last January this year I downloaded LibO (3.4.5) with the main intention
>> to use Base -- but experienced that much problems - first with the
>> installing & JRE and then with many basic functions and especially with the
>> embedded HDBSQL and especially with the quite horrible unlogical
>> documentations -- that I have given up. I am quite sure that I am not alone!
>>
>> Since January I have followed the discussions on this list and am getting
>> even more convinced that LibO is not really meant for ordinary people as an
>> alternative to MSO. It seems mainly to be a playground for a group of
>> open-source enthusiasts with a language of their own.
>>
>> Whom are the new features and finesses meant for, when there is no general
>> info about them and no guiding documentation until 3-4 version generations
>> later? Meanwhile they have only caused problems.
>>
>> When I download a what-ever program for my needs, I want it to work and to
>> work stable and smoothly.
>> I have no need nor time to struggle with different problems, to
>> investigate and test different workarounds -- nor asking for help and
>> waiting perhaps days for an answer that might help if I only happen to
>> understand the advice.
>>
>> Frustration can easily be limited by paying to Microsoft.
>> Best regards
>> Pertti Rönnberg
>>
>>
>> On 19.9.2012 21:48, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have not bought any MSO past MSO-2003.  I moved to OpenOffice.org [as
>>> soon as it read/saved .doc files] till LO 3.3.0 came out.  Then I moved to
>>> LO for all my systems, Windows and Linux.
>>>
>>> Now I create/update the NA-DVD [http://libreoffice-na.us/**
>>> English-3.5-installs/index.**html<http://libreoffice-na.us/English-3.5-installs/index.html>]
>>> project and a 773,000 American Spelling Dictionary for LO.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/19/2012 01:11 PM, John Clegg wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which is why I started migrating 3 months ago! I haven't had to go back
>>>> once.
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 19, 2012 4:57 PM, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P" <
>>>> [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:webmaster@**krackedpress.com<[email protected]>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     No, it is not a good idea to take a break.
>>>>
>>>>     But it is time to tell those people who do use MSO that they are
>>>>     changing their pricing policy and almost forcing their users to
>>>>     rent their products in the near future.
>>>>
>>>>     It is time that the users start thinking about their long term use
>>>>     of MS's Office and other business software.  You no longer will be
>>>>     able to buy their products in any reasonable price, for MS that
>>>>     is, and not know if you rent it for X dollars for the first year,
>>>>     it will not go up to 150% of X dollars in year two.  You will then
>>>>     have to pay their "ransom" or you loose the ability to use the
>>>>     software on your computer.
>>>>
>>>>     Then there is the multi-license discount - or should it be the end
>>>>     of the multi-license discount.  Businesses with 50 or 100
>>>>     computers will be required to but a single user license for every
>>>>     computer at $150+ per license.  The rental agreement plan is not
>>>>     that much better of an option.
>>>>
>>>>     So now you can say that every computer they own can have a copy of
>>>>     LO for free.  Every updated or new version of LO will be free,
>>>>     unlike MSO's policy.  No need to rent or buy anything office suite
>>>>     package anymore.  FREE now and FREE in the future.
>>>>
>>>>     MSO just wants to force a user to pay them over and over for the
>>>>     same software, for as long as you live.  Then when you die, you
>>>>     heirs will be forced to pay MS's blood money for the rest of their
>>>>     lives.  This maybe a good plan as a revenue generation, but not
>>>>     for the users.
>>>>
>>>>     On 09/19/2012 11:22 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hi LiBO folks and especially LibO developers
>>>>         Microsoft's desicion to start renting their software puts
>>>>         ordinary people (and companies) in a fortune with very
>>>>         uncertain costs ahead.
>>>>
>>>>         Should it not be now - if ever! - the perfect time for the
>>>>         LibO devs to take a break in developing new features in the
>>>>         LibO suite and from a certain version start making all LibO's
>>>>         functions and its every existing feature working smoothly and
>>>>         and stable and free of problems and bugs -- from the very
>>>>         beginning:  from installing (with or without JavaJRE), Base
>>>>         and its embedded HDBAQL and its Report Builder, all included.
>>>>         And to complete-update the guiding documents (esp. LibO Help)
>>>>         to an good working quality level so it is understandable and
>>>>         usable for every one.
>>>>         Better late than never if you want LibO to be really accepted!
>>>>         Regards
>>>>         Pertti Rönnberg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 19.9.2012 15:40, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             YES!!!
>>>>             That is why I posted this info to the list.
>>>>
>>>>             Now there is one more thing that it an advantage of LO
>>>>             over MSO. You do not have to rent it.
>>>>
>>>>             I do not know how many people would be comfortable with
>>>>             renting software.  I really would not trust MS not raising
>>>>             the rental fee for year two.  Then there is the issue of
>>>>             having some code that MS will send to either give you
>>>>             another year of service or to disable MSO from being used.
>>>>              I would bet that there will be a "virus" that would be
>>>>             made and sent out that will disable such a built in
>>>>             enable/disable license code system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 09/19/2012 12:23 AM, Anthony Easthope wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 This doesn't really seem to be a good move by
>>>>                 Microsoft as it would drive many people away it!. it
>>>>                 is such a great thing that Lo exists
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 Mirosław Zalewski <[email protected]
>>>>                 <mailto:[email protected]**>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     On 18/09/2012 at 20:13, Doug
>>>>                     <[email protected]
>>>>                     
>>>><mailto:dmcgarrett@optonline.**net<[email protected]>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                           Note, too, that the old argument, "I bought it,
>>>>                         so it's mine," will be out the window--if it's
>>>>                         rented, it clearly is
>>>>                         not yours to copy, etc.
>>>>
>>>>                     As far as I remember, it was never yours. Most
>>>>                     EULAs forbid e.g. reselling of
>>>>                     box copy. They clearly state that they grant you
>>>>                     right to use software,
>>>>                     nothing more.
>>>>                     --                     Best regards
>>>>                     Mirosław Zalewski
>>>>
>>>>                     --                     For unsubscribe instructions
>>>> e-mail to:
>>>>                     
>>>>[email protected].**org<users%[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:users%2Bhelp@global.**libreoffice.org<users%[email protected]>
>>>> >
>>>>                     Problems?
>>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
>>>> unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
>>>>                     Posting guidelines + more:
>>>> http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**Netiquette<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
>>>>                     List archive:
>>>> http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/>
>>>>                     All messages sent to this list will be publicly
>>>>                     archived and cannot be deleted
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     --     For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
>>>>     
>>>>[email protected].**org<users%[email protected]>
>>>>     
>>>><mailto:users%2Bhelp@global.**libreoffice.org<users%[email protected]>
>>>> >
>>>>     Problems?
>>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
>>>> unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
>>>>     Posting guidelines + more:
>>>>    
>>>>http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**Netiquette<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
>>>>     List archive: 
>>>>http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/>
>>>>     All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
>>>>     cannot be deleted
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected].**
>> org <users%[email protected]>
>> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
>> unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
>> Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
>> List archive: 
>> http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/>
>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>> deleted
>>
>>
>
>-- 
>For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
>Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
>
>
>
-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to