-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 12-12-11 07:54 AM, VA a écrit : > I'm obviously not communicating very well. > > I haven't had any "conflict between configuration profiles or during normal usage that leads to a crash or data loss" from running all three programs, so I currently have no reason to file any bug reports. > > So, again, my question. > > Why is it not advisable to run LO and AOO on the same system? What harm does it do to my system?
Because you may have a "conflict between configuration profiles or during normal usage *that leads to a crash* or data loss". /**** THAT LEADS TO A CRASH *** <--- POSSIBLE HARM TO YOUR SYSTEM*/ (ie. software/OS normal operation) If your data isn't critical, this won't matter much. I run similar configurations on a Windows test system for example. I believe in your very first post you also indicated the forks will differ so much in the future that this won't remain practical/compatible enough. F. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: PGP/Mime available upon request Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDHPiIACgkQfUcTXFrypNWO3wCgty1y2ZczJ/8HZtzjvhoD+EDf PCwAoMB2Jc6ENouMLyV1LXTeftjSj+GD =Q0aV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
