On 2013-02-21 12:41 PM, James Knott <[email protected]> wrote:
Economics had nothing to do with it.
Opinions are...
Reagan was a "stick in the mud" conservative who didn't want change.
Economics would have meant moving to it, to keep up with the rest of
the world.
Economics meant it would have cost the govt a TON of money to change over.
Arguments can be made for LONG-term savings, but the reality is, short
term it would be a huge expense.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
