jmadero wrote > No offense at all, I encourage open conversation but I tend to see a one > side conversation "THERE SHOULD BE A 64 BIT FLYING LIBREOFFICE THAT CAN > BAKE ME A CAKE AND CALCULATE A QUADRILLION FORMULAS IN 0.0000001 SECONDS > USING ALL 16 OF MY CORES!" - without the other side of the equation - > "such a product would be incredibly costly and there are thousands of > much more important things to get done that will benefit a lot more > users."
So, having a 64bit Linux version is Ok, creating a 64bit version for MacOS (starting in LO 4.2) is Ok, but asking for a 64bit Windows build is selfish... Interesting. Us Windows users should be ashamed of ourselves... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/64-bit-tp4081444p4082136.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
