Hola Miguel Ángel, all
mariosv wrote > So that's not my logic. Yes, I understood your position. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear. mariosv wrote > My perception of reading here and there, it is not only compile with a 64 > bits tool matter, but a large code adaptation. I think in some > applications like spreadsheets could be much more appreciated the parallel > calculation with several cores. > > Maybe someone with experience in Linux can bring a bit of light about if > there is an appreciable difference between 32 versus 64 bits. I have no doubt that parallel calculation with several cores and any other optimization as those being added by Kohei are much more important. I was simply replying to people in this thread that said there was no point in having a 64bit build because the only benefit is for files larger than 4Gb. If there is no benefit why are the LO Devs "wasting" their time creating a 64bit Mac version? And why did they create a 64bit version for Linux? Just because it is so easy? Reagrds, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/64-bit-tp4081444p4082215.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
