I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that the LO developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I'm pretty sure that that is very false. They work on LO because they want to work on LO, and they probably choose what to work on based on at least the following: a) How many people report a specific bug b) How serious that bug is to people's productivity c) How in line that bug is with current roadmaps d) Regression bugs probably have higher priority e) What parts of the system they know the best f) How much time they have at the moment, and how big the bug is g) How much fun they think it will be (or more likely, which bug will be the least annoying to fix) On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 04:24:03 -0800 (PST) Pedro <[email protected]> wrote: > The logic that "a bug is not important because not many people report > it" has a big flaw: most people give up without bothering to > report... (and in the case of Bugzilla, reporting requires quite a > lot of effort) This logic may not be true in an absolute sense, but consider that it's not normally a question of how important the bug is on its own merits, but how important the bug is compared to other bugs. If 50 people have reported bug A and only 2 people have reported bug B, while bug B may still be important, and there may be another 20 people who haven't reported it, it is not as important as bug A, and there may be another 20 people who haven't reported bug A as well. > In other volunteer based organizations (humanistic, animal > protection, etc), people agree to do work on tasks attributed to them > even if that is not what they feel like doing. The "do whatever you > feel like" model doesn't work. And I don't think anybody is suggesting that that model is the predominant one here. I have pointed out in the past that you cannot expect a developer to work on your bug, because there is nothing forcing him to work on anything but what he wants to, but that doesn't mean that is all he does. It means you can't *force* him to work on what *you* want him to work on. I'm sure the developers *do* give careful consideration to what they work on, it just might not be what you feel they should work on, but they've got a bigger picture than you. Remember, we do have to keep the developers happy to some extent, otherwise they leave. This is true even if they are getting paid (I've left more than one company which was paying me, because I was unhappy with some other aspect of the situation), and especially true if they are not getting paid. Also, just because they don't prioritise the bugs you think are important, doesn't mean they are cherry-picking just the bugs they like, it probably just means they had other, more important things to deal with. Just something to keep in mind. Paul -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
