Hi :) Urma's response is a classic reversal of the facts. The article itself clearly states that the project was easily within budget. Plus the organisation didn't have to upgrade any hardware. See paragraphs 6 & 7 under the heading "Cost".
Regards from Tom :) On 24 November 2013 16:53, M Henri Day <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/11/24 Urmas <[email protected]> > >> "M Henri Day": >> >> For those who missed it, here a link to a fascinating TechReport on >> München's experience in migrating to open sourceIt might worth noticing >> that the migration took more than 13 years, several times of the planned >> budget, and required all the computers to be replaced with newer ones to >> _partially_ succeed. > > > As I read the article, Urmas, the migration has been a striking success, > not despite, but to a large degree, because people were willing to take the > time necessary to do it well. Of course, Microsoft attempts to portray the > results in a far more negative fashion - I have no idea what your take is > or why you felt it necessary to truncate my rather brief post.... > > Henri > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
