In data lunedì 25 novembre 2013 09:01:43, M Henri Day ha scritto:
> 2013/11/24 Urmas <[email protected]>
> 
> > "Tom Davies":
> > 
> > 
> > The article itself clearly states that the project was easily within
> > budget.  Plus the organisation didn't have to upgrade any hardware.
> > See paragraphs 6 & 7 under the heading "Cost".
> > 
> > The report is missing the salaries. Also, there is no way the machine with
> > Windows NT could run Ubuntu 10.10, which is the ultimate Limux base. They
> > have to upgrade the old hardware out in order to do that.
> 
> ​«[N]o way in which the machine [sic !] with Windows NT could run Ubuntu
> 10.10 ...»​ One of the more absurd comments I've yet seen, as anyone here
> can verify by checking the Ubuntu system requirements, available here :
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements.
> Signature «Umas» is about as credible here as when s/he made statements
> about Chinese glyphs....

YADTCFU !!! (Yet Another Debunking Tentative Comment From Urmas!!!) :D


-- 
Valter
Open Source is better!
LibreOffice: www.libreoffice.org
KDE: www.kde.org
Kubuntu: www.kubuntu.org


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to