On 16/03/14 09:01, Pedro wrote: > This just proves my point (going back to the comment by nabbler) that it if > the bureaucracy takes so long, you can't really blame MS (or any other > vendor) for not being 100% compatible.
No. Compatibility is measured against the standard (ISO ODF 1.0 / OASIS ODF 1.2). and not with the ODF 1.2 Extended provided by LibreOffice. Microsoft ODF implementation in MS Office 2013 is a very good one, and no one is blaming Microsoft for this. On the contrary, Microsoft can be blamed for their "intentional" ODF 1.1 - which has never been considered a standard, not even at OASIS - implementation in Microsoft Office 2010, because this was done to kill interoperability with OOo. In addition, Microsoft is providing a different implementation of their non standard OOXML document format for every Microsoft Office release, and this is also intentional to kill imteroperability. -- Italo Vignoli - [email protected] mob IT +39.348.5653829 - mob EU +39.392.7481795 sip [email protected] - skype italovignoli GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0 DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
