On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 02:25:29 AM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > On 07/23/2014 11:40 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> that is supported (roughly speaking although not totally accurate). This > part of the language means things such as "how do I wrote a loop". Then you > have the part of "how do I control a specific word processor". The part that > you use to control the word processor is very specific to LO internals. The > language itself does not provide a means to manipulate what might be > contained in the document. Andrew, no offense meant, but at first sight this reply of yours sounded to me as just an expansion, much better worded of course, of what I myself wrote in that piece in 2005 I had linked to initially: http://archive09.linux.com/feature/47935 then I thought: maybe you mean that the second category of macros I mention there (those for "one specific document") doesn't really exist, or cannot really exist? Thanks, Marco -- M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com http://stop.zona-m.net Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how software is used *around* you -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
