On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 12:12:36 PM +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > I feel that going with Extensions is better than doing macros. It > seems to affect LO in a more general way rather than 1 document at a > time....
yes (and I agree with everything else you said) but... going with extensions is something that only what, 0.00001% of office suite users know how to do? for most people, the choice between: - learning to write real extensions (assuning they do HAVE the skills) - waiting that somebody writes them - writing themselves a quick and dirty macro that does almost everything they need is a total no brainer, isn't it? That's why I ask about "macro interoperability". The less macros there are the better, sure, but let's have a clear idea of what is possible, or should be avoided. -- M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com http://stop.zona-m.net Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how software is used *around* you -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
