+1 On Aug 5, 2014 6:42 PM, "arakish" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards. > > What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version "Release > Candidate", the proven stable version "Stable", the unstable beta-tester > version "Beta"? > > It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of > being different. Is not Libre Office already different? Yes, it is a fork > from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different. > > Stick with the standards. This "fresh" and "still" horse hoowhee is just > that, a big pile of horse hoowhee. > > As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download > page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse > hoowhee. > > Just stick with what almost everyone already knows. Quit trying to be new > and gritty. It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence. > > rmfr > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
