Thoroughly agree!
+1
jdh
On 08/06/2014 06:47 AM, "J. Van Brimmer" wrote:
+1
On Aug 5, 2014 6:42 PM, "arakish" <rmfrun...@gmail.com> wrote:
It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.
What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version "Release
Candidate", the proven stable version "Stable", the unstable beta-tester
version "Beta"?
It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of
being different. Is not Libre Office already different? Yes, it is a fork
from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.
Stick with the standards. This "fresh" and "still" horse hoowhee is just
that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.
As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download
page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse
hoowhee.
Just stick with what almost everyone already knows. Quit trying to be new
and gritty. It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence.
rmfr
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
