On 9/30/2014 8:54 AM, Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > I am sorry to say this, but what is ridiculous here is the inability of > some to even understand what is being discussed.
Oh, I understand what is being discussed. What you don't understand is the complaint. > Fresh is not testing. It has never been "testing". I'm not arguing about what 'Fresh' relates to. I'm saying that creating these totally new, never before head of terms to describe different branches of software - ie, 'Fresh', 'Still' etc - rather than using some standard terms/terminology that actually are used by many different projects (admittedly, there is some amount of variation) - ie, 'Stable', 'Testing', 'Development' - is what is ridiculous. Use STANDARD terms, then precisely define THOSE. If you really insist on having two different 'Stable' branches, then name them something like 'Stable-New' and 'Stable-Old' or something else that makes much more sense than 'Still' or 'Fresh. Of course, if you just enjoy *creating* confusion, then by all means, continue reinventing terms with new ones that no one understands and sound silly on top of it all. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
