On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:05:08 +0200 Sophie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Clearly it is not so easy for new people to figure it out otherwise > > we wouldn't keep on having to answer this same question from so > > many new users. > > So you answer them and they will know, this is how support works. This works for support *after* they have gotten the software, this should *never* be the case for people who want to download the software, that choice should *always* be pretty obvious. If I go to a page to download some software I want, and can't figure out which version I should use, or at least have some sort of idea about the choice being made, I consider just giving up on the software. I'm sure most people are the same. > Yes, but you keep thinking on the same model: stable vs unstable when > both are stable :) change your mind by thinking older in time = more > bugfixes, newer in time = more features but more bugs. But you're getting the very definition of stable wrong: more bugs = less stable So this really *is* a debate about stable vs unstable. That's not to say that the younger product is *unstable*, but it does mean that the older product is *more stable*. Paul -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
