Joel,

just read the MS-Excel explanation you are referring to. Great explanation.
Thanks for pointing to this.

Rob.

On 8 jul. 2015, at 20:42, Joel Madero wrote:

> Sounds to me like normal floating number behavior. I know someone is trying
> to document this and explain why it happens (it's a technical reason that
> goes beyond my skills) but this seems entirely normal behavior given the
> constraints of programming languages generally and hardware in particular.
> 
> 
> Best,
> Joel
> 
> P.S. You can see similar issues in other spreadsheet software. This seems
> to give some indication as to the reasons why:
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/78113 (yes I know it's MSO
> link...just explaining the reason why floating number isn't entirely
> accurate all the time)
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Rui Pedro Caldeira <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hey and thanks for your fast answer. This is the data set:
>> 
>>  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001
>> 0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001  0.000001
>> 0.000002  0.000003  0.999997  0.999997  0.999997  0.999997  0.999998
>> 1.000001  1.999997
>> 
>> Using the formula in the spreadsheet it gives the value: 0.328061419 (VAR)
>> and 0.5727664611 (STDEV)
>> 
>> 
>> And yes, i do mean CHISQ.INV :)
>> 
>> Thanks, Rui.
>> 
>> Cumprimentos,
>> Rui Pedro Caldeira
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Brian Barker <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> At 18:44 08/07/2015 +0100, Rui Pedro Caldeira wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm having some problems with the VAR and STDEV function, when executing
>>>> these lines of code. The average is well calculated but the remaining
>> two
>>>> return very low, unrealistic and equal values (6.93018471335974E-310).
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> That value is 2^-1027 - which is probably the smallest floating-point
>>> value your system can represent without underflow.
>>> 
>>> Have you compared the results produced from your data by equivalent
>> normal
>>> formulae in a spreadsheet cell?
>>> 
>>> Do you mean CHISQ.INV and not CHISQINV?
>>> 
>>> Brian Barker
>>> 
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>>> Problems?
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>>> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>>> deleted
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>> Problems?
>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>> deleted
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Joel Madero*
> LibreOffice QA Volunteer
> [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to