On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 12:15 +0100, Mike Scott wrote: > Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as > published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00
I get a LO 5.0 review... but it is OK, you aren't missing anything. It is a pretty typical drive-by rubbish review which spends most of its time nit-picking superficial issues. Mostly it reads like an add for pay-for products [he even includes links and prices]. "Among the new features in LibreOffice 5.0 are some that you probably won't care about," ... yeah, classy. I love reviewers who know what features I need and what is important to me. And he clearly does not know how to do versioning in LO. So he criticizes it as wanting. I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews - EASY MONEY! I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:[email protected]> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
