On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote:
On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews
Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review?
It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review.
EASY MONEY!
The days of the paid, professional reviewer are numbered.
From one side, are reviews written for gratis across the social media;
From the other side, bots are writing reviews;
From the third side, content distributors are trying to slash costs
wherever and whenever possible;
I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews.
The primary virtue of BYTE! reviews was that there was a sense of
objectivity, in what was rated, and how it was rated. There were a
couple of times when the reviewer was trying to say the product was
"good", when their own ratings showed that it was bad, and vice-versus.
jonathon
Thought I'd share this. One of my latest open source pieces for
TechRepublic about LibreOffice 5.0.
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/libreoffice-5-0-the-strongest-release-to-date/
Jack
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
