On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 07:40 +0200, Robert Großkopf wrote: > Hi Harvey, > > > > Yes, my output ends similarly, but there are no entries like the > > '(supported, searched)' against any of the 3 versions. > > > > Does that mean I have a v1 processor and the support for v1 has > > been > > removed with LO 26.2 onward? > > > > ....hmm, not very environmentally friendly if I have to throw my > > old > > working configurations onto the rubbish tip. Hoping that is not > > yet > > necessary, before I also have to leave the scene. My Dell desktop > > is > > proving to be very robust. > > Hope the following will show it right way: > > The building of packages will be made on a system, where > x86-64-v2 (supported, searched) > is the result. So you need a system with the same minimum to use the > packages. > > You could cretae your own packages of the source Code of LO and it > will > work. > > I would prefer to use the latest packages of LO 25.8., because you > will > need this for your database. > Hi Robert, all I understand is that the LO packages must be built for compatibility with my version of x86-64 processors. The role of those 3 empty subfolders and the significance of the '(supported, search)' flags, I can only make a vague guess. Harvey
-- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
