On 09/05/2026 21:49, Harvey Nimmo wrote:
On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 07:40 +0200, Robert Großkopf wrote:
Hi Harvey,
Yes, my output ends similarly, but there are no entries like the
'(supported, searched)' against any of the 3 versions.
Does that mean I have a v1 processor and the support for v1 has
been
removed with LO 26.2 onward?
....hmm, not very environmentally friendly if I have to throw my
old
working configurations onto the rubbish tip. Hoping that is not
yet
necessary, before I also have to leave the scene. My Dell desktop
is
proving to be very robust.
Hope the following will show it right way:
The building of packages will be made on a system, where
x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)
is the result. So you need a system with the same minimum to use the
packages.
You could cretae your own packages of the source Code of LO and it
will
work.
I would prefer to use the latest packages of LO 25.8., because you
will
need this for your database.
Hi Robert,
all I understand is that the LO packages must be built for
compatibility with my version of x86-64 processors. The role of those 3
empty subfolders and the significance of the '(supported, search)'
flags, I can only make a vague guess.
Harvey
Hi Harvey. What version of openSUSE are you running, what is your output
from ~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
I have Leap 16 which installed Libreoffice 25.2.5.2 from the SUSE
repository.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
