may be take look this link http://bioteam.net/dag/sge6-funct-share-dept.html
On 2/22/2011 9:51 AM, Andreas Haupt wrote:
Hi Reuti and Richard, hmm, actually the scheduler configuration should be correct for such a setup. But maybe I just can't see the wood for the trees ... [oreade38] ~ % qconf -ssconf algorithm default schedule_interval 0:0:1 maxujobs 0 queue_sort_method load job_load_adjustments np_load_avg=1.0 load_adjustment_decay_time 0:7:30 load_formula np_load_avg schedd_job_info true flush_submit_sec 1 flush_finish_sec 1 params none reprioritize_interval 0:0:0 halftime 24 usage_weight_list cpu=1.000000,mem=0.000000,io=0.000000 compensation_factor 5.000000 weight_user 1.000000 weight_project 0.000000 weight_department 0.000000 weight_job 1.000000 weight_tickets_functional 1000 weight_tickets_share 10000 share_override_tickets FALSE share_functional_shares TRUE max_functional_jobs_to_schedule 1000 report_pjob_tickets TRUE max_pending_tasks_per_job 50 halflife_decay_list none policy_hierarchy FS weight_ticket 0.500000 weight_waiting_time 0.000000 weight_deadline 3600000.000000 weight_urgency 0.000000 weight_priority 1.000000 max_reservation 250 default_duration 9999:00:00 Do you see a common mistake here? There are< 100 waiting jobs in the queue most of the time. Thanks, Andreas On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 15:38 +0100, Richard Ems wrote:On 02/22/2011 03:07 PM, Andreas Haupt wrote:Do you see a similar behaviour? Is it a misconfiguration? Anything I could do (apart from watching the queue regularly and schedule "by hand" ...)?We use the same GE version and have a "similar" configuration, but we don't start parallel jobs on that many slots. Could it be that max_reservation is set too low? Regards, Richard
<<attachment: laotsao.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
