Reuti <[email protected]> writes: > Am 25.07.2011 um 23:17 schrieb Mike Hanby: > >> This may be a bug, but testing the ~/.sge_request approach produced the >> following results: >> >> * qsub job without the -M arg, email was delivered to the address specified >> in ~/.sge_request >> * qsub job with -M and two emails are sent, one to the qsub -M email, the >> other to the one in ~/.sge_request >> >> Instead of overwriting the maillist, multiple -M's apparently append to the >> current maillist. Bummer. > > A list of addresses is valid in principle. > > The man page of `qsub` states the same beginning "Defines or redefines" for > -M as for -q, and for -q it was an issue of some time until it got fixed and > replaced the given wc_queue_list. > > I would suggest to file an issue.
I can fix it if it's clear it's the right thing to do, but it looks like a more general issue with list-valued options, and a bit of a mess. Only -q seems to be treated specially by qsub. Also other programs use a different mechanism for processing the options, for some reason, with -M explicitly handled differently. Any strong opinions? _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
