On 10 January 2012 15:40, Reuti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 10.01.2012 um 16:03 schrieb William Hay:
>
>> According to:
>> http://arc.liv.ac.uk/pipermail/gridengine-users/2010-December/033190.html
>> The mpiexec.hydra provided with Intel MPI doesn't tightly integrate
>> with Grid Engine and one therefore has to use MPD (which is a pain).
>
> Yes, I wonder when Intel will use a newer version of MPICH2 for their library.
>
>
>> However the MPICH2 FAQ
>> claims(http://wiki.mcs.anl.gov/mpich2/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Q:_What_are_process_managers.3F)
>> that process managers are interchangeable between different MPICH2
>> derivatives.
>
> But it's not clear, whether they refer to the same MPICH2 version changing 
> only the proces manager, or also to start something based on MPICH2-1.2 with 
> a process manager from MPICH2-1.4.

I think given the way they name the wire protocols it is implied that
version numbers are irrelevant but I was hoping for someone with
practical experience.

>
>
>> Has anyone tried using the mpiexec.hydra from a later version of
>> MPICH2 (or derivative such MVAPICH2) to launch intel MPI processes?
>> What were the results?
>
> Why not using MPICH2 on its own directly? What does Intel MPI offer in 
> addition, they are at version 4 still?

Ours is not to reason why ours is but to integrate or die....


>
> -- Reuti
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to