Hi,

Am 17.02.2013 um 09:01 schrieb Joseph Farran:


> I am using plain Functional Share in it's basic automatic way with no 
> projects, deadline or urgency.
> 
> and it's working, but for most users but not everyone.   Here is my config:
> 
> # qconf -sconf| egrep "enforce|fshare"
> enforce_project              false
> enforce_user                 auto
> auto_user_fshare             100

Did you change this value in the past and it could have been copied with a 
different value to the user entry?


> # qconf -ssconf | fgrep weight
> usage_weight_list cpu=1.000000,mem=0.000000,io=0.000000
> weight_user                       1.000000
> weight_project                    0.000000
> weight_department                 0.000000
> weight_job                        0.000000
> weight_tickets_functional         1000000
> weight_tickets_share              0
> weight_ticket                     1.000000
> weight_waiting_time               0.000000
> weight_deadline                   0.000000
> weight_urgency                    0.000000
> weight_priority                   0.000000
> 
> My first question is can the Functional Shares be displayed via the command 
> line?
> 
> From qmon GUI, I click on the "Functional Policy" tab and on the window I can 
> see the FP share distributions.

I fear no. You can `grep` it out of ("*" should be supported as argument 
though):

qconf -suser $(qconf -suserl | tr '\n' ',')

-- Reuti


> Some users have 100, others have 0 and a couple have 5000.    The sum adds up 
> to 100% of course, but why are some users getting zero while others are 
> getting 5000 tickets?
> 
> Shouldn't the Function Shares be equally distributed?
> 
> If Grid Engine is confused, is there a way to reset the Functional Shares to 
> be evenly distributed?
> 
> Joseph
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to