I took a look at the latest SoGE code, and I *think* that jobs with
holds have priorites explicitly forced to zero.  Once the hold is
removed, they should be assigned calculated priority values according to 
whatever your scheduler configuration dictates.

Or are you talking about the '-p priority' value set by the users?

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:45:06PM -0500, Greg Ball wrote:
The target for the -hold_jid is a standard job and is assigned a priority.
The subsequent (second, third, etc,) jobs submitted with the -hold_jid
option receive no (0.00000) priority, I would like these jobs to receive
their own non-zero priorities but still be started sequentially.

Regards,

GM

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Reuti <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

> Am 12.12.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Greg Ball <[email protected]>:
>
> When submitting jobs with dependency holds using the -hold_jid option
the subordinate (held) jobs are assigned a 0 priority, as they inherit the
priority of the hold target jobid.  Is it possible for the held (hqw) jobs
to each be assigned their own priority and still function sequentially, or
are there alternate methods for processing sequential jobs such that they
obtain their own priorities.

I'm not quite clear what you want to achieve. You have three jobs - one
running and a second waiting for the end of that job. And then a third job
which is waiting for the completion of the second job. For this third job
you want an increased priority?

--- Reuti


> Regards,
>
> GM
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
Jesse Becker (Contractor)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to