3.0 is still some time away from being feature complete. On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Ruben Laguna <ruben.lag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see, thank you very much. > > I'll take a look at how to implement the methodMissing support since > I'm really interested on having this at some point in Groovy. Is there > any chance to see this in Groovy 3.0 if you receive a satisfactory > patch? or is too late for 3.0? > > Best regards/Rubén > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> > wrote: > > On 08.12.2017 10:31, Ruben Laguna wrote: > >> > >> I've found the following *old* bug report from 2009: > >> > >> [GROOVY-3867 Allow methodMissing/propertyMissing to be defined through > >> category |https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3867] > >> > >> which says that methodMissing does not work since Groovy 1.6.5. > > > > > > ok, then it is something we never got to fix > > > >> So I've opened a new JIRA ticket [iGROOVY-8408 invokeMethod cannot be > >> set through category|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8408] > > > > > > as long as we have the GroovyObject based logic we currently have > > invokeMethod cannot receive this kind of treatment. > > > > bye Jochen > > > > -- > /Rubén >
