MG, > On 31. 5. 2020, at 6:37 PM, MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > Inhowfar would that differ from the existing map based argument support, like > @NamedVariant etc > (http://docs.groovy-lang.org/2.5.0/html/gapi/groovy/transform/NamedVariant.html) > > <http://docs.groovy-lang.org/2.5.0/html/gapi/groovy/transform/NamedVariant.html>, > respectively what is your intention here ?
Ha, I must be completely blind and dumb, too — I did check, but somehow, I completely overlooked that ASTT! Thanks, will test the thing, probably it's precisely what I wanted to do. All the best, OC > On 31/05/2020 12:45, OCsite wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> for both convenience and considerably improved source readability and >> robustness, I am considering an ASTT which would convert positional >> arguments to named ones, i.e., something like >> >> @Named foo(bar,int bax=666,List baz) { >> ... whatever ... >> } >> >> turned to something like >> >> foo(Map __map=null) { >> def bar=__map?.bar >> int bax=__map?.bax==null?666:__map?.bax >> List baz=__map?.baz >> ... whatever ... >> } >> >> In farther future with my own typechecking script it might even allow to >> typecheck named arguments, though that might prove a bit at the difficult >> side — but technically possible. >> >> Has anybody tried something like that before? If so, bumped into some hidden >> pitfalls perhaps? >> >> Thanks, >> OC >> >