Hello, I am wanting to clean up my Apache 2.2.9 (Debian Package) installation after modifying it to virtual host 7 domains in order to make it more robust, understandable, secure and maintainable. I want to have one of these sites being a SSL site.
----- I have read the section on NameVirtualHost, http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#namevirtualhost * Does NameVirtualHost get used in every entry in /etc/apache2/sites-available/ ? Is it redundant to include that declaration in all the others as well? ----- The reason I ask this is I am having a warning delivered to me. I initially have one website enabled. The entry in sites-available is defined like this: NameVirtualHost *:80 <VirtualHost *:80> .... </VirtualHost> When I enable a second website whose entry is identical in layout, I reload and am told: [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts And when I comment out the NameVirtualHost *:80, for the second entry in sites-available, the warning is gone. This leads me to believe that this declaration is redundant. What are your thoughts? Thanks for your help! Tim Legg --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
