On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim Legg wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am wanting to clean up my Apache 2.2.9 (Debian Package) installation >> after modifying it to virtual host 7 domains in order to make it more >> robust, understandable, secure and maintainable. I want to have one of >> these sites being a SSL site. >> >> ----- >> >> I have read the section on NameVirtualHost, >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#namevirtualhost >> >> * Does NameVirtualHost get used in every entry in >> /etc/apache2/sites-available/ ? Is it redundant to include that declaration >> in all the others as well? > > sites-available is a debianism designed to confuse.
I find it actually a quite usefull feature. Allows me to quickly enable/disable virtual servers. > You should only have one NameVirtualHost (for any IP:port). > It goes before any of the virtualhost definitions. The way I did it is to have a "000_default" in my sites-available, that's always enabled (linked in sites-enabled). In this file I have the NameVirtualHost directive, and the default, catch-all, virtual host. The other virtual hosts config files don't have the NameVirtualHost directive. Krist -- [email protected] [email protected] Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland -- A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation. Q: What's wrong with top-posting? A: Top-posting. Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] " from the digest: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
