After switching to mod_php from php-fpm we are told the site is working 4x faster using mod_php instead of php-fpm.
Any explanation? Thanks From: William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Saturday, January 9, 2016 1:58 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Circumstances when mod_php would run faster than PHP-FPM? Mod_proxy_fcgi + php-fpm or mod_fcgid with php fcgi sapi should both be equivalent when tuned correctly. Your only option for running php in process efficiently is to use the non-threadsafe php in the httpd preform module. Your only option for running httpd efficiently is the event, or at least the worker mpm. Since usually only a subset of the http requests are to a php resource, the answer is almost always 'no'. On Jan 8, 2016 16:48, "Rose, John B" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Apache 2.4 On the same system, same web site, are there circumstances when Apache using mod_php would run faster than Apache using PHP-FPM? Thanks
