At some point here we need to bite the bullet and put IPv6 DNS in
the ".". Why not an equal but separate set of root name servers
for V6 under IANA control? The named.root file can be distributed
in three flavors. IPv4 only, 6 and 4, 6 only? This is a political
issue and perhaps off the mark here.
Should this be discussed with the DNS Root Server System Advisory
Committee or is the root servers status a political nightmare?
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Well, IPv6 users who want to access the IPv4 only DNS server will need
>> some form of solution. There is indeed no particular problem in
>> deploying a relay-resolver -- we are doing that all the time.
>
>
> Ultimately, relay resolvers won't work. Our goal is to transition from
> v4 to v6. That means we have to at some point deploy native v6
> servers.
>
> It is true that relay resolvers are a useful transition mechanism --
> we use them right now, in fact. I'm merely suggesting we should also
> be moving towards the long term solution as well.
>
> Perry
>
> --
> Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> Quality NetBSD CDs, Support & Service. http://www.wasabisystems.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
