>>
>> % I think:
>> % - it should be okay to deploy AAAA records to certain degree
>> % - we need to be very conservative about deplying A6 records,
>> % as A6 presents highly different behavior than A/AAAA records.
>> % # of queries would increase, # of additoinal records would
>> % go skyrocket.
>I think it was recognized a long time ago that the initial deployment
>of A6 records should be limited to two (or at most 3) levels. The question
>is whether that is enough to avoid the horrors described by Dan Bernstein
>over on IPNG.
I see... it is unfortunate RFC2874 does not cover it.
it has A6 reference from leaf customer A6 record to ISP A6 record,
and 5 levels of indirection.
itojun
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Brian E Carpenter
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Joseph T. Klein
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns itojun
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Robert Elz
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Antonio Querubin
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns itojun
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
