On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Pekka Savola wrote:

> That is true, but it may have it's drawbacks.  Often, still, IPv6 
> connectivity is worse than with IPv4.  People who are dual-stack will use 
> IPv6 when trying to reach 'nanguo'.  It may be more unoptimal yet.
> 
> For conservative IPv6 adoption, I recommend the former (at least first).  
> For more radical IPv6 adoption, and for non-production services, the 
> latter is usually more suitable.

You also want to be very careful with services where you use a common
name space, one example with an I-D wtitten for it being MX hosts.

Tim

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to