-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > Antonio Querubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > [cut off long list of people, except ml's] > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > > > > > 2002:c058:6301::/48 192.88.99.1/32 AS786 > > > > > > > 192.88.99.1/32 is *THE* anycast address, it is *NOT* routable.... > > > > And you don't own it either, please read RFC3068 and stop that > > > > foolish announcement. In whois.ripe.net this network is documented: > > > > > > Whoa there! Just because a block is anycast doesn't mean it's NOT > > > routable. It just means there may be multiple destinations > > > and multiple routes to those destinations. Otherwise what use is it? > > > > It's for making 2002::/16 reachable, not for making the IPv4 version > > reachable over IPv6 ;) > > Oops. I thought you were advocating that 192.88.99.0 should never be > announced. Sorry for the misunderstanding :) Au contraire mon ami :) I would rather see more and more ISP's deploy anycast capable 6to4 relays. They should then at least put the route into their IGP so that clients employing 6to4 have a fast way out. It would also mean that the ISP itself has some IPv6 deployment and could be looking into native connectivity to the rest of the world, both being a good thing. Greets, Jeroen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int. Comment: Jeroen Massar / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ iQA/AwUBP2QqHymqKFIzPnwjEQI4BgCeJqWbLHPX1IcaXUeL5qVP/MeCZlEAn2O3 26bfTL2i4mt5w8HSTx+ImodK =I0+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
