ok. We will try again with new release. But now I'm more confident with the refactoring and perhaps will maintain the @PersistenceCapable(identityType=IdentityType.DATASTORE.
Nice to see it will be simply a decission of the user of the framework. El 14/05/2013, a las 08:43, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> escribió: > On 13 May 2013 14:19, GESCONSULTOR - Óscar Bou <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> Regarding @PersistenceCapable(identityType=IdentityType.APPLICATION) >> support, I will double-check but as I remember an Apache Isis exception was >> raised with a message indicating that only >> @PersistenceCapable(identityType=IdentityType.DATASTORE and >> @PersistenceCapable(identityType=IdentityType.UNSPECIFIED were supported. >> >> > I definitely removed this exception in the last few months. So, it might > well be how our current official release works, but using snapshot you > should find you can use APPLICATION identity type. > > > > >> >> I will ask "my bosses", but I don't expect much problems on publicising >> that it uses Apache Isis as a case study. >> >> Thx. Let's get you into production first, then go round the loop on that. > > > Cheers > Dan
