On 19 November 2014 16:41, Jeroen van der Wal <jer...@stromboli.it> wrote:
> Just double-checked: the master branch of isis-module-security uses the > latest and greatest version of Isis, 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT > > [1] > > https://github.com/isisaddons/isis-module-security/blob/master/pom.xml#L32-L36 > > (though the screenshots in the README are still of 1.7.0) > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jeroen van der Wal <jer...@stromboli.it> > wrote: > > > Hi Martin, > > > > I would advice against option 2 because you lose an easy update path to > > newer versions of the security module. > > > +1 to that advice. > > Tell us more about your use-case so we can see what the options are. > > > In particular, is the additional information you need to store mandatory with no sensible default (ie would need to prompt for it), or would the current signatures of the methods in ApplicationUsers domain service suffice? > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jeroen > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Martin Balmaceda < > > martin.balmac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >
