On 10 December 2014 at 09:22, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > The improvement is good ! Especially for newcomers. > > ok, thx for the vote. > What is the backward compatibility policy ? > I didn't have a chance to review the changes but I assume the old > annotations will be supported for 1.x, probably deprecated ? > > Exactly. Will keep them, but deprecated, for the 1.x codeline. ta Dan > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Dan Haywood < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 10 December 2014 at 09:09, GESCONSULTOR - Óscar Bou < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > First thoughts here ... > > > > > > > > > It seems obvious that it would be clearer and also easier to learn (as > > you > > > could easily discover all property, collection or action options easily > > > simply by looking at the possible annotation fields. > > > > > > > Yes, that's my main motivation... grokkability/discoverability. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So seems a great idea ... :)) > > > > > > > OK, thanks for the vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I miss "name" as an equivalent to @Named. > > > > > > > > Hmmm, it should be there, for all of the @XxxLayout annotations, eg > > > > @DomainServiceLayout(named="...") > > @PropertyLayout(named=...") > > > > etc > > > > It's in the XxxLayout annotations (rather than the "domain" annotations) > > because it only impacts the UI. > > > > Thx > > Dan > > >
