On 3 January 2015 at 11:32, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @Dan: Maybe it is a good idea to add a link to this repo at > http://www.isisaddons.org/ ? > Or even fork Jeremy's repo to https://github.com/isisaddons or your/mine > own GitHub account so it is easier for us to update it in the future. As per previous email, I think we ought to merge Jeremy's stuff with what's we already have (which are much more extensive). But I think it's a good idea to move these templates out from the website and into a separate github repo as part of "isisaddons". Would you be happy to do set up a new repo for us? Otherwise I'll pick it up when I get a moment. > For > example I'd prefer to namespace the template names. The existing templates use "is" as a common prefixl is this what you meant? > Or make them "File > Template"s instead of "Live Template"s. > > Not sure I know the pros and cons of the two. I'm guessing that a "file template" might make sense for Jeremy's top-level "domclass" and "domservice", but Live Templates make more sense for the class members such as Jeremy's "domprop" or the existing "isp*", "isc*", "isa*" and so on? Cheers Dan
