It's not elegant but I bypass this limitation by returning the parent after
adding a child:
public class Parent {
...
public Parent addChild(string name) {
...
* return this;*
}
}
On 11 November 2015 at 16:45, Dan Haywood <[email protected]>
wrote:
> No technical reason, just never made it to the top of the backlog...
>
>
>
> On 11 November 2015 at 15:43, Cesar Lugo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello. Just wanted to know if there is a technical reason that prevents
> > Isis
> > wicket viewer to have updatable collections when represented in dependent
> > or
> > standalone tables, right on the table (add, update, delete). If so, is
> > there
> > a way to extend it?. Not something critical for us at the moment, just
> want
> > to better understand it at a general level.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cesar.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
>
