Thank you Jerome. I also did that :), and yes it helps! so now when you add it looks like you add it within the same table, but I still need to use an action dialog to add, update or delete. It would be quite useful to insert, update and delete rows within the table, I have found many times users expect that, particularly when working with considerable data entry situations.
This link shows the example in Apache Wicket: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples-6.0.x/repeater/wicket/bookmarkable/org.apache.wicket.examples.repeater.FormPage?10 Cesar. -----Original Message----- From: Jeroen van der Wal [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 10:25 AM To: users Subject: Re: Collections It's not elegant but I bypass this limitation by returning the parent after adding a child: public class Parent { ... public Parent addChild(string name) { ... * return this;* } } On 11 November 2015 at 16:45, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > No technical reason, just never made it to the top of the backlog... > > > > On 11 November 2015 at 15:43, Cesar Lugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello. Just wanted to know if there is a technical reason that > > prevents Isis wicket viewer to have updatable collections when > > represented in dependent or standalone tables, right on the table > > (add, update, delete). If so, is there a way to extend it?. Not > > something critical for us at the moment, just > want > > to better understand it at a general level. > > > > > > > > Cesar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
