On Sunday, 15 November 2015 5:24 AM, Dan Haywood
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is full circle for me... I wrote a book on TogetherJ back around 2002;
>and it was at that time that I first met Richard (Pawson) and Rob
> (Matthews) presenting the Naked Objects at an OO conference in Oxford.
>TogetherJ provided design-time synchronicity between the UML class diagram
>and the code, while Naked Objects provided run-time synchronicity between
>the code and the UI. In the original Naked Objects book you'll see some
>screenshots from the app that I wrote during that all-afternoon workshop.
>But I've never found a tool that was as good as TogetherJ (may it rest in
>peace) at doing the design-time synchronicity .
TogetherJ went west after Peter Coad sold Together software to Borland.
However it was an expensive tool all the same.
It also had support for the colour modelling archetypes.
You are right - there hasn't been a better tool since.
I think Sparx EA is probably the best bet right now for round trip code
generation.
However it would be best just to use it for TQA purposes
(ensure the developers have not strayed from the consensus domain model).
Regards,
David.
.
> Cheers
> Dan
