On 6/28/06, Vijay Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to use Jackrabbit and for a great # of users we only need to
provide read only access and i was reading on the wiki section abvout
performance, it says that
---------------------------------------------------------------
it's a good practice to share a single anonymous session for read only
access if possible, it would reduce the time that write actions will take.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Does it mean to say that 'session' is thread safe at method level for read
only operations , or do we have to synchronize the call on session? or do
you think should we have a pool of read only sessions ?
you can assume that Session (at least the jackrabbit implementation)
is thread-safe if it is used for *reading only*.
cheers
stefan
Thanks
Vijay
