Hi, I want to know which one of XPath/SQL is fastest (optimal) while using Jackrabbit?
Does jackrabbit first translates SQL into XPath before execution? Is there any underlying overhead of translation between XPath or SQL or vice versa? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XPath-versus-SQL-in-Jackrabbit-tf3852409.html#a10913188 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
