gsoap wrote:
I want to know which one of XPath/SQL is fastest (optimal) while using Jackrabbit?
they are both equally fast.
Does jackrabbit first translates SQL into XPath before execution?
no, both syntaxes are first translated into a jackrabbit internal query tree representation and then executed.
Is there any underlying overhead of translation between XPath or SQL or vice versa?
jackrabbit does not translate between the two languages. or do you want to translate statements in your application?
regards marcel
