David Nuescheler wrote:
I would like to make sure that I understand your intention.
(a) JCR should not mandate the scope of query wrt the transient space
(b) Jackrabbit should implement isolation differently
I will quote my original message:
[quote]
=== Proposal ===========================================
4.6.12 QueryResult
QueryResults reflect any pending changes currently stored in the session.
========================================================
[/quote]
My intention is:
1) Spec *must* define query scope and isolation level(s).
2) JackRabbit *must* implement query exactly per spec.
I am listening for all members and looking for a use-cases that contradict my
idea. Such discussions prove my idea right or wrong.
When discussion will cool down I will summarize it and send a feedback to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So far it looks like I hit the honey pot, I see a few use-cases from list
members in support of an idea and none against and it bother me.
--
Ivan Latysh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
