IvanLatysh wrote:
...
>>Because that, I think, would not be sufficient for some queries
possible in
>>JCR 2.0.
Can you please provide an example of such query?
I would think it could happen as soon as there's a join in the query.
Part of the query will evaluate to false in the persistent state, so the
node will not be included in the result set. However, to re-evaluate the
query again on nodes changed in transient storage, you would have to
re-access the whole persisted state.
At the end consistence is more important. Even if query run against
persistence state only without taking into account transient state is
should return persistent state.
But now query run against persistent state and return transient state,
that is totally confusing.
It has been stated before that you can easily avoid that by either
calling save() before, or doing the query on a separate session without
pending changes.
Best regards, Julian
