On 8/10/07, woolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i thought that databases optimised lookups based on the defined > relationships. is this not the case? > > also, what about data integrity? are we relying on JackRabbit to manage that > for us? but if so, surely it would want some help from the db? > > it just seems to be a very "strange" schema.....
aha? i would agree that it is a very simple schema, it contains just one table, i.e. FS_ENTRY ;-). > > > > Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > > > hi phil > > > > On 8/10/07, woolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Having set up JackRabbit and pointed it at an Oracle instance for it to > >> use > >> as the filesystem, i've looked at the schema and it appears that there > >> are > >> no relationships between any of the tables. > >> > >> Surely this is inefficient? Won't there be a performance hit for this? > > > > why? > > > > cheers > > stefan > > > >> > >> Phil. > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12087895 > >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12088214 > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
