i thought that databases optimised lookups based on the defined relationships. is this not the case?
also, what about data integrity? are we relying on JackRabbit to manage that for us? but if so, surely it would want some help from the db? it just seems to be a very "strange" schema..... Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > hi phil > > On 8/10/07, woolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Having set up JackRabbit and pointed it at an Oracle instance for it to >> use >> as the filesystem, i've looked at the schema and it appears that there >> are >> no relationships between any of the tables. >> >> Surely this is inefficient? Won't there be a performance hit for this? > > why? > > cheers > stefan > >> >> Phil. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12087895 >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12088214 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
