Paco, If you have a test case available on the issue you found with POI 3.0.2 I'd be more than happy to pursue that with the POI folks. Again, I am interested in making sure that using newer versions of the other libraries work fine in my jackrabbit's environment.
** julio -----Original Message----- From: Paco Avila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Other 3rd party libraries in Jackrabbit's war file Yes, ?pdfbox 0.7.3 is much better than the default Jackrabbit version. I have been testing POI 3.0.2 and failed to extract text from some Excel files which was done whithout problems with POI 3.0.1. El jue, 01-05-2008 a las 14:39 -0700, Julio Castillo escribió: > Thought I share this with you all and save you some time. > > Because we use a good number of open source libraries, I had to test > Jackrabbit (to the degree that I use it) with newer versions of other > libraries that are embedded in the jackrabbit war file. > > I successfully deployed and ran with the following upgrades. > > - slf4j 1.5.0 > - commons-codec 1.3 > - commons-collections 3.2 > - commons-httpclient 3.1 > - junit 4.4 > - log4j 1.2.15 > - xerces 2.9.1 > - pdfbox 0.7.3 that should include new dependency on fontbox 0.1 (See > bug# > 1567) > - POI 3.0.2 > > Couldn't upgrade the tm-extractors (see bug# 1568) > > Julio Castillo > Edgenuity Inc. > -- Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GIT Consultors
